Written by: Lee Ann Rush
Recent legislation dubbed the “Monsanto Protection Act” has put the controversy over genetically engineered (GE) foods* back into the headlines, as research continues to identify more and more negative effects resulting from the proliferation of these “Frankencrops.” GE foods are those which have had their genetic composition altered in order to add a “desirable” trait or eliminate a less-desirable one. The most common GE foods are herbicide-resistant and pest-resistant crops such as corn, alfalfa and soy. These crops have been designed to produce proteins that kill insects but, it is claimed, cause no harm to mammals, and also to withstand weed-killing herbicides without crop damage (are we all headed for the last Roundup?). Not surprisingly, the major architects of GE foods are multi-national corporations such as Monsanto and DuPont.
Concerns about the safety of GE foods range from their potential toxicity, which may cause cancer and increase food allergies, to issues of compromised nutritional value, increased antibiotic resistance, and damage to the environment. Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) have both given GEs their stamp of approval, claiming that they are just as healthful and nutritious as traditional crops, many experts beg to differ. The argument has become quite heated, as personally witnessed by television’s Dr. Mehmet Oz. On a recent Dr. Oz program discussing the pros and cons of GE foods, there was such acrimony between the two sides that they couldn’t even appear onstage at the same time to debate the issue!
A recently-published French study monitored lab rats which were fed a diet of genetically engineered herbicide-resistant corn. The rats developed massive tumors and suffered early deaths, ostensibly caused by the GE corn containing traces of herbicide; rats fed a “traditional” diet fared better and lived longer. Proponents of GE foods have, predictably, panned the French study, claiming flawed research and biased implementation. What is clear is that more research on the long-term effects of GE foods on humans is essential, and that meanwhile, Americans must be given a choice as to whether or not they want to risk consuming genetically engineered products.
Many European countries, including the UK and Russia, have already banned certain GMOs for human consumption and require the labeling of products containing them. The citizens of California will soon vote on a bill requiring that GE foods be labeled as such. Still, though, the FDA insists: “{While} we recognize and appreciate the strong interest that many consumers have in knowing whether a food was produced using bioengineering, FDA supportsvoluntary labeling (emphasis added) that provides consumers with this information and has issued draft guidance to industry regarding such labeling.”
*According to scientists, the commonly-used term “genetically modified organisms” (GMOs) is technically incorrect, because, whether in the fields or in a laboratory, all organisms have been genetically modified in some manner.